Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

ADIL US Equity

Adial Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Health Care · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1513525 · FY ends Dec 31
$5.76
+0.30 (+5.60%)
USD · as of 2026-08-19 · marketstack

ADIL · 10-K · period ended 2020-12-31

← all ADIL documents
filed 2021-03-22 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1,4882,087 of 4,942468k characters rendered

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves

a high degree of risk. In addition to the risks related to our business set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other

information included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should carefully consider the risks

described below before purchasing our securities. Additional risks, uncertainties and other factors not presently known to us or

that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.

Risks Relating to our Company

We have incurred net losses every

year and quarter since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses in the future.

We are a clinical stage biotechnology pharmaceutical

company that is focused on the discovery and development of medications for the treatment of addictions and related disorders of

AUD in patients with certain targeted genotypes. We have a limited operating history. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development

is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product

candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially

viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, and we

continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. To date, we have not

generated positive cash flow from operations, revenues, or profitable operations, nor do we expect to in the foreseeable future.

As of December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $31.5 million.

Even if we succeed in commercializing our

product candidate or any future product candidates, we expect that the commercialization of our product will not begin until 2024

or later, we will continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenditures to develop and market additional

product candidates and will continue to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flow. We may encounter unforeseen

expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. The size of our

future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate revenue. Our prior

losses and expected future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our shareholders’ equity and working

capital.

We currently have no product revenues and may not generate revenue at any time in the near future, if at all. Currently, we have

no products approved for commercial sale.

We currently have no products for sale

and we cannot guarantee that we will ever have any drug products approved for sale. We and our product candidate are subject to

extensive regulation by the FDA, and comparable regulatory authorities in other countries governing, among other things, research,

testing, clinical trials, manufacturing, labeling, promotion, marketing, adverse event reporting and recordkeeping of our product

candidates. Until, and unless, we receive approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities for our product candidates, we

cannot commercialize product candidates and will not have product revenues. Even if we successfully develop products, achieve regulatory

approval, and then commercialize our products, we may be unable to generate revenue for many years, if at all. We do not anticipate

that we will generate revenue for at least several years, if at all. If we are unable to generate revenue, we will not become profitable,

and we may be unable to continue our operations. For the foreseeable future, we will have to fund all of our operations from equity

and debt offerings, cash on hand and grants. In addition, changes may occur that would consume our available capital at a faster

pace than expected, including changes in and progress of our development activities, acquisitions of additional candidates and

changes in regulation. Moreover, preclinical and clinical testing may not start or be completed as we forecast and may not achieve

the desired results. Therefore, we expect to seek additional sources of funding, such as additional financing, grant funding or

partner or collaborator funding, which additional sources of funding may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

We have had limited operations to

date and there can be no assurance that we will be able to execute on our business strategy.

We are a clinical stage company and have

had limited operations to date. We have yet to demonstrate our ability to overcome the risks frequently encountered in our industry

and are still subject to many of the risks common to such enterprises, including our ability to implement our business plan, market

acceptance of our proposed business and lead product, under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel,

financing and other resources, competition from better funded and experienced companies, and uncertainty of our ability to generate

revenues. In fact, though individual team members have experience running clinical trials, as a company we have yet to prove that

we can successfully run a clinical trial. There is no assurance that our activities will be successful or will result in any revenues

or profit, and the likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the stage of our development. In addition, no assurance

can be given that we will be able to consummate our business strategy and plans, or that financial, technological, market, or other

limitations may force us to modify, alter, significantly delay, or significantly impede the implementation of such plans. We have

insufficient results for investors to use to identify historical trends. Investors should consider our prospects in light of the

risk, expenses and difficulties we will encounter as an early stage company. Our revenue and income potential is unproven and our

business model is continually evolving. We are subject to the risks inherent to the operation of a new business enterprise, and

cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully address these risks.

We and our independent registered

public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have suffered recurring losses from

operations based on our development plans and our operating requirements. These conditions, among others, considered in the aggregate

raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance

of the accompanying financial statements. Although the funds raised as a result of the completion of our IPO, the receipt of proceeds

from the exercise of warrants, and completion of various follow on financings have sustained our operations through 2020, based

on our current development plans and operating requirements, we project that, without additional funding we will have fully expended

our funds in the fourth quarter of 2021. We have executed an equity purchase agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”)

with Keystone Capital, LLC (‘Keystone Capital”) , which allows us to obtain, depending on our stock’s market

price and fulfillment of certain conditions, up to $15 million in equity financing, of which we have already raised $2.0 million.

However, since the market price of our stock is volatile, we cannot state with certainty how much, if any, of the remaining funding

will be available. The actual number of shares that are sold to Keystone Capital may depend based on a number of factors, including

the market price of the common stock during the sales period, during which sales cannot take place if the market price of a share

of our common stock is below one dollar. Actual gross proceeds may be less than $15.0 million, which may impact our future liquidity.

Because the price per share of each share sold to Keystone Capital will fluctuate during the sales period, it is not currently

possible to predict the number of shares that will be sold or the actual gross proceeds to be raised in connection with those sales.

Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If we cannot raise

the necessary capital to continue as a viable entity, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business and our stockholders

may lose some or all of their investment in us.

We will need to secure additional

financing in order to support our operations and fund our current and future clinical trials. We can provide no assurances that

any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. Our forecast of the period of time through

which our current financial resources will be adequate to support our operations and the costs to support our general and administrative,

selling and marketing and research and development activities are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties.

If we do not succeed in raising additional

funds on acceptable terms, we may be unable to complete planned product development activities or obtain approval of our product

candidate from the FDA and other regulatory authorities. We do not have any committed sources of capital other than our equity

line with Keystone Capital for which there can be no assurance that we will meet the use requirements. Moreover, if our trial activities

are significantly delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic, we would not be able to reach database lock with cash on hand even with

receipt of the grants to which we have applied. In such case, we would need to obtain additional funding, either through other

grants or through potentially dilutive means. In any case, we will need to raise additional capital to complete our development

program and to meet our long-term business objectives.

Cash and cash equivalents at the date of

this annual report filing on form 10-K will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months, given current

expectations. We will require additional financing as we continue to execute our business strategy, including that we will require

additional funds in order for additional Phase 3 trials of AD04, as well as any additional clinical trials or other development

of any products we may acquire or license, including those acquired from Purnovate. Our liquidity may be negatively impacted as

a result of a research and development cost increases in addition to general economic and industry factors. We anticipate that,

to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the incurrence of other indebtedness, additional

equity financings or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. In addition, we may raise additional funds to finance

future cash needs through grant funding and/or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. If we raise additional funds

by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, including pursuant to our Equity Purchase Agreement with Keystone Capital, our

stockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may

involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional

debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements

with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products, future revenue streams or product candidates

or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. The covenants under future credit facilities may limit our ability

to obtain additional debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at

all. Any failure to raise capital in the future could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue

our business strategies.

Additional financing, which is not in place

at this time, may be from the sale of equity or convertible or other debt securities in a public or private offering, from a credit

facility or strategic partnership coupled with an investment in us or a combination of both. Our ability to raise capital through

the sale of equity may be limited by the various rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and The

Nasdaq Capital Market (the “Nasdaq”), which place limits on the number of shares of stock that may be sold. Equity

issuances would have a dilutive effect on our stockholders. We may be unable to raise sufficient additional financing on terms

that are acceptable to us, if at all. Our failure to raise additional capital and in sufficient amounts may significantly impact

our ability to expand our business. For further discussion of our liquidity requirements as they relate to our long-term plans,

see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity

and Capital Resources.”

We have identified weaknesses in

our internal controls, and we cannot provide assurances that these weaknesses will be effectively remediated or that additional

material weaknesses will not occur in the future.

As a public company, we are subject to

the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect that the requirements of these rules and

regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult,

time consuming and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among

other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial reporting.

We do not yet have effective disclosure

controls and procedures, or internal controls over all aspects of our financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine

our internal controls over financial reporting . Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal

control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. We will be required to expend time and

resources to further improve our internal controls over financial reporting, including by expanding our staff. However, we cannot

assure you that our internal control over financial reporting, as modified, will enable us to identify or avoid material weaknesses

in the future.

We have identified material weaknesses

in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal

control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements

will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified to date include (i) policies and procedures

which are not yet adequately documented, (ii) approval processes and review processes and documentation for such reviews, (iii)

GAAP experience regarding complex transactions and reporting, and (iv) optimal segregation of duties and levels of oversight. As

such, our internal controls over financial reporting were not designed or operating effectively.

We will be required to expend time and

resources to further improve our internal controls over financial reporting, including by expanding our staff. However, we cannot

assure you that our internal control over financial reporting, as modified, will enable us to identify or avoid material weaknesses

in the future.

Our current controls and any new controls

that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business, including increased complexity resulting

from our international expansion. Further, weaknesses in our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting

may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their

implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result

in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control

over financial reporting could also adversely affect the results of management reports and independent registered public accounting

firm audits of our internal control over financial reporting that we will eventually be required to include in our periodic reports

that will be filed with the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures, and internal control over financial reporting

could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative

effect on the market price of our common stock.

Our independent registered public accounting

firm is not required to audit the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we are no longer an

“emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act and meet other requirements. At such time, our independent registered

public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal

control over financial reporting is documented, designed or operating. Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and

internal control over financial reporting could have a material and adverse effect on our business and operating results, and cause

a decline in the market price of our common stock.

We rely on a license to use various

technologies that are material to our business and if the agreement were to be terminated or if other rights that may be necessary

or we deem advisable for commercializing our intended products cannot be obtained, it would halt our ability to market our products

and technology, as well as have an immediate material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our prospects are significantly dependent

upon the UVA LVG License. The UVA LVG License grants us exclusive, worldwide rights to certain existing patents and related intellectual

property that covers AD04, our lead and currently only product candidate. If we breach the terms of the UVA LVG License, including

any failure to make minimum royalty payments required thereunder or failure to reach certain developmental milestones and completion

of deadlines, including, submitting an NDA by December 31, 2024 and commencing commercialization of an FDA approved product by

December 31, 2025, or other factors, including but not limited to, the failure to comply with material terms of the Agreement,

the licensor has the right to terminate the license. If we were to lose or otherwise be unable to maintain this license on acceptable

terms, or find that it is necessary or appropriate to secure new licenses from other third parties, we would not be able to market

our products and technology, which would likely require us to cease our current operations which would have an immediate material

adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our business is dependent upon the

success of our lead product candidate, AD04, which requires significant additional clinical testing before we can seek regulatory

approval and potentially launch commercial sales. We do not have any other products in clinical development.

Our business and future success depends

upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval of and then successfully commercialize our lead investigational product candidate,

AD04. AD04 is in clinical stage development. To date, our main focus and the investment of a significant portion of our efforts

and financial resources has been in the development of our lead and only investigational product candidate, AD04, for which we

are currently conducting the ONWARD Phase 3 clinical trial with approximately 290 patients in Scandinavia and Central and Eastern

Europe, which targets the reduction of risk drinking (heavy drinking of alcohol) in subjects that possess selected genetics of

the serotonin transporter and/or 5-HT3 receptor gene. We expect that at least one additional Phase 3 clinical trial will be required

for approval, as well as, one or more supportive clinical studies Even though we are pursuing a registration pathway based on specific

FDA input and guidance and the EMA precedents and guidance, there are many uncertainties known and unknown that may affect the

outcome of the trial. These include adequate patient enrollment, adequate supply of our product candidate, potential changes in

the regulatory landscape, and the results of the trial being successful.

All of our future product candidates, as

well as AD04, will require additional clinical and non-clinical development, regulatory review and approval in multiple jurisdictions,

substantial investment, access to sufficient commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts before we can

generate any revenue from product sales. We expect AD04 will need at least two Phase 3 trials (including the ONWARD Phase 3 trial

are conducting in Scandinavia and Central and Eastern Europe) and one or more supportive clinical studies to gain approval in either

the U.S. or Europe for AUD and additional development activity, including, without limitation, clinical trials, in order to seek

approval for the use of AD04 to treat any other indications (e.g., such as opioid use disorder, gambling addiction, smoking cessation,

and other drug addictions). In addition, because AD04 is our most advanced product candidate and there is limited history information

on long-term effects of our proposed dosage, there is always a chance of developmental delays or regulatory issues or other problems

arising, with our development plans and depending on their magnitude, our business could be significantly harmed. In any case,

the costs associated with completion of our ONWARD Phase 3 trial, a second, confirmatory trial, commercialization of AD04, and

the costs of developing AD04 for use in other indications are significant, and will require obtaining funding, possibly through

equity sales, before AD04 generates revenue.

We may apply to the FDA for the AD04 program to be designated

as a fast track development program, accelerated approval, priority review, or breakthrough therapy designation. Designation as

a fast track development program, accelerated approval, priority review, or breakthrough therapy designation is within the discretion

of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe that one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation as a fast track

development program, accelerated approval, priority review, or breakthrough therapy designation, the FDA may disagree and instead

determine not to make such designation. Even if we receive a fast track development program, accelerated approval, priority review,

or breakthrough therapy designation, the receipt of such designation or approval for a product candidate may not result in a faster

development of any product candidate or approval process for product candidate. In addition, even if one or more of our product

candidates qualify as fast track development program, accelerated approval, priority review, or breakthrough therapy designation,

the FDA may later decide that the product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period

for FDA review or approval will not be shortened and the designation may result in no benefit to the Company.

Our future success depends heavily on our

ability to successfully manufacture, develop, obtain regulatory approval, and commercialize AD04, which may never occur. We currently

generate no revenues from our product candidate, and we may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable drug.

The active ingredient of our product

candidate, ondansetron, is currently available in generic form.

Ondansetron, the active pharmaceutical

ingredient (“API”) of our current drug treatment, was granted FDA approval as Zofran® in January 1991

and is approved in many foreign markets. Ondansetron is commercially available in generic form, but not available: (i) at the formulation/dosage

levels expected to be marketed by us, or (ii) with a requirement to use a diagnostic biomarker, as we expect to be the case with

AD04. Although ondansetron has been approved to treat nausea and emesis it has not been approved to treat AUD and it has not been

approved for daily long-term use as planned by us. Clinical testing to date of ondansetron at the higher doses used to treat nausea/emesis

have not shown effectiveness in treating AUD or any other addictive disorder; however, if a third party conducted a Phase 3 clinical

program and showed success treating AUD at those doses, we could not prevent such third party from marketing ondansetron for AUD

at those doses.

Results from clinical studies suggest that

high intravenous doses of ondansetron may affect the electrical activity of the heart. In a Drug Safety Communication dated June

29, 2012, the FDA stated that: “A 32 mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron (Zofran, ondansetron hydrochloride, and generics)

may affect the electrical activity of the heart (QT interval prolongation), which could pre-dispose patients to develop an abnormal

and potentially fatal heart rhythm known as Torsades de Pointes.” In addition: “No single intravenous dose should exceed

16 mg.” There are also several recent lawsuits claiming that Zofran® used for the unapproved use of morning

sickness causes birth defects. Although we do not believe that our dosage will cause such adverse event there can be no assurance

that the negative side effects of the generic drug that have been found in higher dosages will not occur in our dosage or otherwise

deter potential users of our product candidate and adversely impact sales of our product candidate. If we were to be required to

have such a warning on our drug label, patients may be deterred from using our product candidates.

In addition, we also face the risk, that

doctors will prescribe off label, the generic form of ondansetron to treat AUD despite the different dosage of ondansetron in the

generic form from that in AD04, the lack of demonstrated clinical efficacy against AUD at the currently available doses (i.e.,

the Zofran ® and approved generics), and the potential safety concerns if the currently available/higher doses are

taken chronically as would be needed for AUD or other addictions. Physicians, or their patients, could divide the lowest dose existing

oral tablet into more than ten parts to approximate the necessary AD04 dosage.

Although we believe that any attempt by

competitors to reformulate and market ondansetron at our intended dosage levels, while technically feasible, infringes on our intellectual

property rights, and should, accordingly, be actionable, we cannot give assurances that we would be successful in defending our

rights or that we will have access to sufficient funds necessary to successfully prosecute any such violations of, or infringements

on, our intellectual property rights. Additionally, we cannot ensure investors that other companies will not discover and seek

to commercialize low doses of ondansetron, not currently available, for other indications.

Coronavirus could adversely impact

our business, including our clinical trials.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus,

COVID-19, was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then, the COVID-19 coronavirus has spread to multiple countries,

including countries in Europe which we have planned or active clinical trial sites. As the COVID-19 coronavirus continues to spread

around the globe, we will likely experience disruptions that could severely impact our business and clinical trials, including:

● delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials;

In addition, the outbreak of the coronavirus

(“COVID-19”) could continue to disrupt our operations due to absenteeism by infected or ill members of management or

other employees, or absenteeism by members of management and other employees who elect not to come to work due to the illness affecting

others in our office or laboratory facilities, or due to quarantines. COVID-19 illness could also impact members of our Board of

Directors resulting in absenteeism from meetings of the directors or committees of directors, and making it more difficult to convene

the quorums of the full Board of Directors or its committees needed to conduct meetings for the management of our affairs.

The global outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus

continues to rapidly evolve. The extent to which the COVID-19 coronavirus may impact our business and clinical trials will depend

on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread

and possible resurgences of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United

States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States

and other countries to contain and treat the disease.

While there exists a large body of

evidence supporting the safety of our primary API, ondansetron, under short-term use, there are currently no long-term use clinical

safety data available.

We intend to market our products, particularly

AD04, for long-term use by patients seeking to reduce their number of days of heavy drinking, and we assume future sales volumes

reflecting such extended use.

Studies of Zofran ® conducted

as part of its FDA and other regulatory agencies review process found that the drug is well-tolerated and results in few adverse

side effects at dosages almost 100 times the dosage expected to be formulated in AD04. However, to the best of our knowledge, no

comprehensive clinical study has been performed to date that has evaluated the safety profile of ondansetron for long-term use.

We expect the FDA will require us to provide safety data in at least 100 patients for 12 months and can offer no assurances that

safety results of these long term use studies will lead to any subsequent approval for long-term use. There can be no assurance

that long-term usage of ondansetron, at dosages anticipated by us, will be safe. Though the FDA has stated it will not require

additional non-clinical testing nor will it require a QT interval prolongation clinical study, such statements by the FDA are not

legally binding on the agency.

All of our current data for our lead

product candidate are the result of Phase 2 clinical trials conducted by third parties and do not necessarily provide sufficient

evidence that our products are viable as potential pharmaceutical products.

Through our proprietary access to relevant

laboratory and clinical trial results of the University of Virginia’s research program, and through our reliance on publicly

available third-party research, we possess toxicology, pharmacokinetic, and other preclinical data and clinical data on AD04. As

of now, AD04 has completed only Phase 2 clinical trials and we are now conducting its first Phase 3 trial. There is no guarantee

that Phase 2 results can or will be replicated by pivotal Phase 3 studies.

To date, long-term safety and efficacy

have not yet been demonstrated in clinical trials for our investigational product candidate. Favorable results in early studies

or trials may not be repeated in later studies or trials. Even if our clinical trials are initiated and completed as planned, we

cannot be certain that the results will support our product candidate claims. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical

trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. We cannot be sure that the results of later clinical trials

would replicate the results of prior clinical trials and preclinical testing, nor that they would satisfy the requirements of the

FDA or other regulatory agencies. Clinical trials may fail to demonstrate that our product candidate is safe for humans and effective

for indicated uses. Preclinical and clinical results are frequently susceptible to varying interpretations that may delay, limit

or prevent regulatory approvals or commercialization. Any delay in, or termination of, our clinical trials would delay our obtaining

FDA or EMA approval for the affected product candidate and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize that product candidate.

Previous clinical trials using ondansetron

have had different trial designs, doses, parameters and endpoints than the current ONWARD Phase 3 clinical trial that is expected

to serve as a basis for approval of AD04. Though various doses of ondansetron have been tested as treatments for alcohol addiction

(Johnson, BA et al., 2011; Johnson, BA et al., 2000; Kranzler et al, 2003; Sellers, EM et al., 1994), the 283-patient Phase 2b

clinical trial on which we are largely basing our clinical expectations only tested one dosing regimen, which was weight-based

(Johnson, BA et al., 2011). We plan to use a fixed dose in future clinical trials that we believe provides good coverage given

the dose ranges tested clinically; however, it is possible that the dose selected will not be the optimal dose and so drug effects

may be limited or not be demonstrated sufficiently in clinical testing. Additionally, only one genotype in the genetic panel that

will be used to define patients that are genotype positive for treatment with AD04 was used in primary analyses of the Phase 2b

trial and three of the genotypes were added to the panel after a retrospective exploratory analysis of the Phase 2b data. The genotype

in the panel related to the 5-HTT, that was included in the primary analysis (Johnson, BA et al., 2011) appears to make up about

half of the patients that are genotype positive. The three genotypes related to modulation of the 5-HT3 receptor were selected

based on a retrospective analysis that was constrained to 18 single-nucleotide polymorphism (“SNPs”) identified for

analysis (Johnson, BA et al., 2013). Therefore, confidence in the effects of the 5-HT3 genetics is less than that for the 5-HTT

genetics, and this could negatively impact the treatment effect of AD04 in Phase 3 trials for a segment of the patients identified

as genotype positive, which could dilute the overall demonstrated effect of AD04 in the trial.

The endpoints for the Phase 2b clinical

trial of AD04 were reduction in the severity of drinking, measured as drinks per day of drinking alcohol and reduction frequency

of drinking, measured by days of total abstinence from alcohol. These are surrogate endpoints for the endpoints expected to be

required for approval, which, for Europe, are expected to be reduction of heavy drinking days (defined herein), measured in percentage

of heavy drinking days per month, and total average alcohol consumed per month, and, for the United States, is expected to be the

percentage of patients that have no heavy drinking days in the final 2 months of a six month treatment regimen of AD04. Though

the Phase 2b trial showed a statistically significant effect against both pre-specified endpoints and when analyzed for reducing

heavy drinking days, all when compared against the placebo group, it is possible that AD04 could affect the endpoints of the Phase

2b trial while not demonstrating a strong enough effect to gain approval.

The Phase 2b clinical trial was 12 weeks

in duration, including a one week placebo run-in period, and the Phase 3 trials expected to be required for approval will be 24

weeks. Though the effect of AD04 against AUD in the Phase 2b trial appeared to begin in the first month of the trial and appeared

durable throughout the trial, we cannot be sure the effect will extend for the duration of the Phase 3 trials.

The FDA and/or EMA may not accept

our planned Phase 3 endpoints for final approval of AD04 and may determine additional clinical trials are required for approval

of AD04.

The FDA has indicated to us that a comparison

of the percent of patients with no heavy drinking days in the last two months of a six month clinical trial between the drug and

placebo groups will be a satisfactory endpoint for determination of a successful Phase 3 trial of AD04 and has published the draft

guidance Alcoholism: Developing Drugs for Treatment Guidance for Industry dated February 2015 indicating this endpoint for

the development of drugs for AUD. Similarly, the EMA has in the past accepted the co-primary endpoints of reduction from baseline

in days of heavy drinking and reduction total grams of alcohol consumed per month and has published the Guideline on the development

of medicinal products for the treatment of alcohol dependence on February 18, 2010 stating these endpoints as approvable endpoints

for alcohol addiction treatment. Despite these indications, neither the FDA nor the EMA is bound to accept the stated endpoint

if a new drug application for AD04 is submitted and their definitions of a heavy drinking day may change. We, however, can offer

no assurance that the FDA or EMA will approve our primary endpoints, that we can achieve success at the any endpoints they do approve,

or that these potential benefits will subsequently be realized.

We will incur additional costs and

our approvals could be delayed if the FDA or EMA requires additional clinical trials in patients that are negative for the genotypes

targeted by AD04. In addition, clinical trials conducted with only genotype positive subjects will likely result in labeling restricted

to treating patients that are genotype positive.

Although the FDA has indicated that it

sees little evidence of positive effects for the use of AD04 in subjects that are negative for the genotypes targeted by AD04 and

has stated that it would not object to the AD04 Phase 3 clinical trials going forward without including these additional subjects,

the FDA has indicated that some research in this area may be required prior to approval of AD04 for AUD within the marker negative

population. We believe the data supports our hypothesis that no further studies in genotype negative patients need be conducted.

However, the FDA has indicated that any approval based on a trial only in genotype positive subjects would result in labeling restricted

to treating patients that are genotype positive. If further studies are required, we will incur additional costs not anticipated,

and it could delay approval of AD04 or, if the results of such studies are not positive for AD04, it may result in AD04 not being

approved or it may result in AD04’s patents failing to protect AD04 against generic competition.

Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act

(“PREA”), NDAs or supplements to NDAs must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the

claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation

for which the drug is safe and effective. We plan to test AD04 in adolescent patients (ages 12-17) as part of our next Phase 3

trial. If successful, we intend to request labeling for treating adolescent patients.

Our use of the currently manufactured

clinical trial material in the plan Phase 3 trial is dependent upon the review and approval of the relevant regulatory agencies

and authorities.

The Company has manufactured additional

clinical trial material for use in the ONWARD trial and other studies that may be required by the FDA or EMA. No assurance can

be given that the CMC plan developed by us will be satisfactory to the regulatory agencies or that the clinical trial material

produced for use in clinical trials of AD04 will be approved for use in the trials, either of which could result in delay of the

clinical trial program and a requirement for increased investment prior to commencement of clinical trials.

Our lead investigational product,

AD04, is dependent on a successful development, approval, and commercialization of a genetic test, which is expected to be classified

as a companion diagnostic.

Treatment with AD04 will be dependent on

identification of patients with a genetic test (i.e., a companion diagnostic). Companion diagnostics and complementary diagnostics

are regulated as medical devices by the FDA and, as such, require either clearance or approval prior to commercialization. While

the technology for the test we plan to use is well established, it cannot be certain the testing laboratory we set up will be able

to conduct the test with the selectivity and sensitivity that will be required or that the genetic test will be approved by FDA

for such use, which could increase the time and cost to develop AD04 and possibly prevent marketing approval. While we have been

party to a joint meeting with the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (“CDER”, the FDA division responsible for

drug approvals) and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (“CDRH”, the FDA division responsible for device

approvals, including genetic tests) at which agreement was reached as to the development path for the genetic test, neither CDER

nor CDRH is bound to accept our planned submission package even if the data is positive. We have been instructed by CDER and CDRH

that we need to obtain a separate approval or marketing authorization for the companion diagnostic genetic test from CDRH. We are

collecting and storing additional blood samples from all patients enrolled in the ONWARD Phase 3 trial, and plan to do so for any

future trials that may be conducted, in the event of any difficulties, however, we cannot be certain we can overcome all of the

technological, logistical or regulatory hurdles related to the genetic testing, which include, without limitation, technical validation

of the test (e.g. specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility, robustness of methods), clinical validation acceptable to CDER and

CDRH, all of which are needed for approval of AD04 and its companion diagnostic genetic test. Failure in any of these areas could

delay approval of AD04, increase the cost necessary to achieve approval of AD04 or prevent approval of AD04.

If we obtain approval of AD04 and its genetic

test, we currently plan to distribute the genetic test as widely as possible to third party testing companies with limited attention

to capitalizing on the revenue potential of the genetic test itself in order to achieve wider availability of the genetic test

to drive market uptake of AD04. However, we cannot be sure that third party testing companies will be willing to provide the test,

that reimbursement for the test will be available to make such business profitable, or that taking a genetic test will be acceptable

to patients or physicians. Additionally, our plans may change so that we attempt to make the test a material business of our own.

In this event, the availability of the genetic test in the market could be reduced, limiting market uptake of AD04, the testing

business could fail, and we could be in a position where it never reaches profitability. As one of our products/services, the genetic

test will be subject to all of the risks stated elsewhere herein related to reimbursement of our products and failure to achieve

adequate reimbursement could limit the potential sales of both the genetic test and AD04, and there is no assurance that the diagnostic

will be approved or authorized for marketing.

We have limited experience as a company

conducting clinical trials.

We are a clinical stage company and our

success is dependent upon our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and commercialization of our investigational products,

and we have not demonstrated an ability to perform the functions necessary for the approval or successful commercialization of

any product candidates. The successful commercialization of any product candidates may require us to perform a variety of functions,

including:

● participating in regulatory approval processes;

● formulating and manufacturing products; and

● conducting sales and marketing activities.

We have limited experience conducting and

enrolling patients in clinical trials. While certain members of our management and staff have significant experience in conducting

clinical trials, to date, we have not successfully completed any clinical trials as a company. Until recently, our operations have

been limited primarily to organizing and staffing our company, acquiring, developing and securing our proprietary technology and

preparing for clinical trials of our product candidate. These operations provide a limited basis to assess our ability to develop

and commercialize our product candidate and the advisability of investing in our securities.

All of the preclinical and clinical trials

relating to our product candidate have been conducted by third parties. Although we have recruited a team that has significant

experience with managing clinical trials, we have no experience as a company in conducting our own clinical trials. In part because

of this lack of experience, we cannot guarantee that planned clinical trials will be completed on time, if at all. Large-scale

trials require significant additional financial and management resources, monitoring and oversight, and reliance on third-party

clinical investigators, contract research organizations (“CROs”), or consultants. Relying on third-party clinical investigators,

CROs and manufacturers, which are all also subject to governmental oversight and regulations, may also cause us to encounter delays

that are outside of our control.

Our product candidate is in early

stages of development.

Because our product candidate is in early

stages of development it will require extensive clinical and other testing. Although our lead product candidate has completed a

283-patient Phase 2b clinical trial, we cannot predict with any certainty if or when we might submit an application for regulatory

approval for any of our product candidates or whether any such application will be accepted for review by the FDA or EMA, or whether

any application will be approved upon review.

Even if our clinical trials are completed

as planned, we cannot be certain that their results will support our proposed indications. Success in preclinical testing and early

clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the results of later

clinical trials will replicate the results of prior clinical trials and preclinical testing. Results from earlier clinical trials

may not be repeated in later clinical trials. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our product candidate is

safe and effective for their proposed uses. This failure could cause us to abandon our product candidate and may delay development

of other product candidates. Any delay in, or termination of, our clinical trials will delay and possibly preclude the filing of

any NDAs with the FDA or EMA and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our product candidate and generate product revenues.

Our clinical trials may fail to demonstrate

adequately the safety and efficacy of AD04 or any future product candidates, which would likely prevent or delay regulatory approval

and commercialization.

Before obtaining regulatory approvals for

the commercial sale of AD04 or any future product candidates, including AD04, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and

expensive preclinical testing and clinical trials that product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication.

Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at

any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of product candidates

may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Results from subsequent clinical trials may not be the same

as the results from the Phase 2b clinical trial that was conducted by the University of Virginia. There is typically an extremely

high rate of attrition from the failure of product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages

of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile despite having progressed through preclinical studies

and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced

clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety issues, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. We

can make no assurances that, should our Phase 3 studies provide statistically significant and clinical meaningful results evidencing

that treatment with AD04 results in reduced days of heavy drinking or abstinence, these same results will also provide evidence

of greater patient efficacy rates and or patient benefit ratios vis-à-vis currently marketed drug treatments. Most product

candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved as products.

In addition, even if the trials are successfully

completed, we cannot guarantee that the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities will interpret the results as we do, and more trials

could be required before we submit product candidates for approval. To the extent that the results of the trials are not satisfactory

to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities for support of a marketing application, approval of product candidates may be significantly

delayed, or we may be required to expend significant additional resources, which may not be available to us, to conduct additional

trials in support of potential approval of product candidates.

If we experience delays in the enrollment

of patients in our clinical trials our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

Although we expect to complete patient

enrollment in our landmark ONWARD pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in the second or third quarter of 2021, our inability to locate

and continue to enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients in our current or any future clinical trials would result in significant

delays or may require us to abandon one or more clinical trials. Retention of subjects in clinical trials related to AUD can be

challenging relative to trials in some other indications due to the nature of the target population. In addition, COVID-19 has

made trial operation, including, without limitation, patient enrollment, more difficult and more difficult to project. Our ability

to enroll patients in trials is affected by many factors out of our control including the size and nature of the patient population,

the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, the prevalence

and successful recruiting of patients that are genotype positive, competing clinical trials, and clinicians’ and patients’

perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new

drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating. Due to the use of a biomarker to determine enrollment in our

current and planned Phase 3 clinical trials, we will have a limited population of patients to draw from for our Phase 3 clinical

trials.

Global health crises may adversely

affect our planned operations.

The conduct of our ongoing ONWARD Phase

3 trial could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to a pandemic or

other health crisis, such as the recent outbreak of novel coronavirus (COVID-19). A significant outbreak of contagious diseases

in the human population could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect our ongoing trial. Such events could

result in the complete or partial closure of one or more of our critical vendors. In addition, an outbreak near our clinical trial

site locations would likely impact our ability to recruit patients, delay our clinical trials, and could affect our ability to

complete our clinical trials within the planned time periods. Also, public health authorities in the jurisdictions in which our

trial is taking place may take steps that would result in significant delay in our trial activities.

Our success will be dependent upon

adoption by physicians and others.

Even if the FDA and/or EMA approves our

product candidate or any future product candidates we may develop or acquire, the product will require acceptance among physicians,

healthcare payers, patients, and the medical community. Our products are to be used in combination with a genetic test targeted

at patients with certain specified genotypes. It is anticipated that physicians will recommend patients for screening prior to

administration of AD04 or future product candidates. Therefore, our business will be substantially dependent upon our ability to

communicate with and obtain support from physicians regarding the benefits of our products relative to alternative treatments available

at that time.

Rapid technological change and substantial

competition may impair the business.

The pharmaceutical industry is subject

to rapid and substantial technological change. Technological competition in the industry from pharmaceutical and biotechnology

companies, universities, governmental entities, and others diversifying into the field is intense and is expected to increase.

Many of these entities have significantly greater research and development capabilities, as well as substantially more marketing,

financial, and managerial resources than we do, and represent significant competition. Acquisitions of, or investments in, competing

biotechnology companies by large pharmaceutical companies could increase these competitors’ financial, marketing, and other

resources. We cannot assure you that developments by others will not render our products or technologies noncompetitive or that

we will be able to keep pace with technological developments. Competitors have developed, or are in the process of developing,

technologies that are, or in the future may be, the basis for competitive products. Some of these products may have an entirely

different approach or means of accomplishing similar therapeutic endpoints than products we are currently developing. These competing

products may be more effective and less costly than the products that we are developing. In addition, conventional behavioral therapies

and other treatment approaches currently in use today may continue to be used instead of, rather than in conjunction with, our

products.

Any product that we successfully develop,

and for which we gain regulatory approval, must compete for market acceptance and market share. Accordingly, important competitive

factors, in addition to completion of clinical testing and the receipt of regulatory approval, will include product efficacy, safety,

timing, and scope of regulatory approvals, availability of supply, marketing and sales capability, reimbursement coverage, pricing,

and patent protection. Existing or future competing products may provide greater therapeutic convenience or clinical or other benefits

for a specific indication than our products, or may offer comparable performance at a lower cost. If our products fail to capture

and maintain market share, we may not achieve sufficient product revenues and our business will suffer.

We will compete against fully integrated

pharmaceutical companies such as Alkermes and Indivior and smaller companies that are collaborating with larger pharmaceutical

companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Many of these competitors

have drugs already approved or in development. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or together with their collaborative

partners, operate larger research and development programs or have substantially greater financial resources than we do, as well

as significantly greater experience in:

● developing drugs, and other therapies;

● undertaking preclinical testing and clinical trials;

● formulating and manufacturing drugs, biologics and other therapies; and

● launching, marketing and selling drugs, and other therapies.

Risks Relating to Our Acquisition of

Purnovate

The combined company may not experience

the anticipated strategic benefits of the Acquisition.

We believe the acquisition of Purnovate

will provide certain strategic benefits which would enable Adial to enhance its business and accelerate its business plan through

an increased access to capital in the public equity markets. The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the

acquisition if the combined company does not achieve the perceived benefits of the Acquisition as rapidly or to the extent anticipated

by us or Purnovate or investors, financial or industry analysts. There can be no assurance that these anticipated benefits of the

Acquisition will materialize or that if they materialize will result in increased stockholder value or revenue stream to the combined

company.

We may be unable to successfully

integrate the Purnovate businesses with its current management and structure.

Our failure to successfully complete the

integration of Purnovate could have an adverse effect on our prospects, business activities, cash flow, financial condition, results

of operations and stock price. Integration challenges may include the following:

● assimilating Purnovate’s technology and retaining personnel;

● minimizing potential adverse effects on existing business relationships; and

● successfully developing the new products and services.

Purnovate has had limited operations to date.

Purnovate is a start-up entity and has

had limited operations to date. As a start-up entity, Purnovate is subject to many of the risks common to such enterprises, including

its ability to implement its business plan, market acceptance of its proposed business and products, under-capitalization, cash

shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financing and other resources, competition from better funded and experienced

companies, and uncertainty of its ability to generate revenues. There is no assurance that its activities will be successful or

will result in any revenues or profit, and the likelihood of its success must be considered in light of the stage of its development.

Even if it generates revenue, there can be no assurance that it will be profitable. In addition, no assurance can be given that

it will be able to consummate its business strategy and plans, as described herein, or that financial, technological, market, or

other limitations may force it to modify, alter, significantly delay, or significantly impede the implementation of such plans.

Purnovate has insufficient results for investors to use to identify historical trends or even to make quarter-to-quarter comparisons

of its operating results. Purnovate’s revenue and income potential is unproven and its business model is continually evolving.

Purnovate is subject to the risks inherent to the operation of a new business enterprise, and there can be no assurance that Purnovate

will be able to successfully address these risks.

Purnovate has a limited operating history upon which to

evaluate its ability to commercialize its products.

Purnovate is a development-stage company

and its success is dependent upon its ability to develop and commercialize its products and it has not demonstrated an ability

to perform the functions necessary for the successful development and commercialization of any product candidates. The successful

commercialization of any product candidates will require Purnovate to perform a variety of functions, including:

● formulating and manufacturing products; and

● conducting sales and marketing activities.

Purnovate’s operations have been

limited to organizing and staffing Purnovate, acquiring, developing and securing its proprietary technology and undertaking preclinical

studies of its product candidates. Purnovate has yet to engage in any clinical trials and therefore the safety of its product candidates

is uncertain.

Purnovate’s product candidates

are in early stages of clinical trials.

Because Purnovate’s product candidates

are in early stages of development they will require extensive preclinical and clinical testing. Purnovate’s lead product

has not yet entered clinical trials and cost, speed and ability to advance through clinical trials is uncertain. Purnovate cannot

predict with any certainty if or when it might submit an application for regulatory approval for any of its product candidates

or whether any such application will be accepted.

Purnovate’s technology may

not result in any successful drug candidates.

Purnovate has developed what its believes

are lead compounds that could be drug candidates. However, despite there being significant literature and in vitro and in

vivo evidence that adenosine analogs may be effective in treating a number of diseases and disorders, the compounds developed

to date have not been extensively tested in vitro and have not been tested in vivo. It is possible

that any and all compounds or product candidates developed by Purnovate or using its technology may fail or be determined not valuable

to pursue as products for a number of reasons, including, without limitation, due to toxicity, lack of efficacy, lack of stability,

poor manufacturing characteristics or otherwise.

There is uncertainty as to market

acceptance of Purnovate’s technology and products.

Purnovate has conducted its own research

into the markets for its products; however, because it will be a new entrant into the market, it cannot guarantee market acceptance

of its products and has somewhat limited information on which to estimate anticipated level of sales. Purnovate’s products

will require patients and doctors to adopt its technology. Purnovate’s industry is susceptible to rapid technological developments

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-12-31, filed 2021-03-22 · accession 0001213900-21-017009

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 21 headings are on that chain and 15 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.